

| TODAY'S PAPER |
 |
Renovating for a healthier home
Here's how to improve indoor air quality
Tuesday, February 17, 2004 - Page D5

Bill Crawford has a way of simplifying things for homeowners grappling with
the complex issue of indoor air quality. "If I threw a skunk into your house,
would your first step be to turn on a fan, or would you get rid of the skunk?"
Mr. Crawford, a senior research consultant at Canada Mortgage and Housing
Corp., is among air-quality experts seeing increased concern among Canadian
homeowners that indoor pollutants could be affecting their health.
"We get quite a few calls from people who just aren't feeling well, and are
concerned it might be the air," Mr. Crawford says.
At first blush, the idea of renovating to improve indoor air quality is
daunting but the starting point is largely common sense, Mr. Crawford says.
Homeowners should try to reduce the pollutants in their home -- lose the skunks
-- "or they are just wasting their time."
Old carpeting, dirty basements and mould generated by excessive moisture
should be among the first targets. For those who wish to go further, there is a
wide range of products on the market, including air-exchange units, HEPA
filters, ultra-violet air treatment systems and heat-recovery ventilators, that
all promise to improve indoor air quality to varying degrees.
Air experts and the health care community all agree on one point: poor air is
bad for you. There is growing evidence to suggest that bad air quality can
contribute to or even cause a host of long-term health problems.
Short term, there are many people, especially those with pre-existing
conditions like allergies or asthma, who experience symptoms related to
poor-quality air.
"There's no question, in the last two years, our residential business has
doubled or tripled," says Frank Haverkate, who runs a consulting firm that
specializes in indoor air testing, including the use of a mould-sniffing dog.
Jon Baswick of Allanson International, which recently launched an ultraviolet
air-cleaning system known as Swordfish (http://www.swordfishuv.com),
says that the industry as a whole is predicting a 20- to 30-per-cent annual
increase in sales of air quality-related products.
Mr. Crawford of CMHC breaks the causes of poor air into three major
categories -- chemical contaminants, which includes gases from cleaning products
and building materials; too much moisture and the mould that often results; and,
other biological contaminants, such as dust mites, pollen and animal dander.
He says there is much the average homeowner can do to eliminate some of these
causes, and he would start with the carpeting.
"Carpeting, especially carpeting that is 10 or 15 years old, is just a
reservoir of dust and moisture, no matter how well you clean it."
Mr. Crawford says those affected by air-quality issues should give some
serious thought to replacing their carpeting with hardwood flooring or tile.
But, he cautions, that old carpeting has to be removed with care. "I can't tell
you how many calls I get from people who just had their old carpeting removed
and they feel worse than ever."
The explanation, he says, lies with the method of removal -- simply ripping
up the old carpeting puts all the dust, chemicals, moisture and other
contaminants into the air. Covering the carpeting with a sheet of polyethylene
and rolling it up carefully can significantly cut down on the number of
contaminants that become airborne.
Other steps Mr. Crawford recommends include cleaning up the basement --
getting rid of things like old newspapers and books, old paint cans or open
cleaning products. Furniture made from composites, as opposed to solid wood, can
also be a source of airborne contaminants.
Moisture in a home is also a significant problem because it can lead to
mould, and mould spores can represent a significant health hazard. In the
winter, the ideal relative humidity is around 35 per cent -- significantly lower
percentages can lead to dry skin and other irritations, while humidity over 50
per cent is an ideal breeding ground for mould.
Mr. Crawford recommends homeowners concerned about the humidity purchase a
hygrometer (about $20 at most electronics stores), and check their levels.
The CHMC (http://www.cmhc-schl.gc.ca)
has put together a book called Clean Air Guide, which outlines a long list of
possible contaminants and how to identify and eliminate them.
Those who would rather leave the detective work to the pros can hire a
consultant like Mr. Haverkate (http://www.safeair.ca
and http://www.moulddog.ca),
who will do a complete environmental assessment, including a detailed list of
what corrective action needs to be taken, for about $600.
Mr. Haverkate says that the homeowner or the average contractor can resolve
many of the typical problems but if there is a significant mould problem, he
strongly recommends calling in a specialist.
"If, in fixing it, the mould becomes aerosolized, then it becomes an entire
house issue that's extremely expensive to fix."
Once the worst of the contaminants have been removed, homeowners can consider
other options, like ventilation systems, heat-recovery ventilators, or
air-purification systems. These can range in price from a few hundred to a few
thousand dollars.
The Swordfish system, for example, which cleans the air using ultra violet
rays, can be purchased for $500 to $700.
Breathe easy? Not when the office may be toxic
PATRICK WHITE
From Monday's Globe and Mail
August 6, 2007 at 4:27 AM EDT
One morning 10 years ago, a Halifax-based technician for
Environment Canada arrived at work to find a mysterious manila
envelope on her desk. Curious, she turned it over. Out spilled a
chemical filter mask accompanied by a note from her boss.
“This is for you,” it read. “You are expected to wear it.”
For years, Charlotte Hutchinson had been suffering from
headaches and nausea that she attributed to her workplace. Her
managers had bounced her from office to office in search of one
that didn't make her sick. This flimsy plastic mask was her
employer's final gambit, she says.
“Can you imagine how ridiculous you'd look walking around the
office in a mask?” says Ms. Hutchinson, who no longer works for
the government.
Ms. Hutchinson suffers from environmental hypersensitivity, a
condition that employers and even some doctors have
traditionally viewed with some skepticism. But new research on
office toxins is making Ms. Hutchinson look more like the office
equivalent of the canary in the coal mine.
Last week, Australian researchers unnerved cubicle dwellers
the world over with a report showing that laser printer
emissions are as bad for the lungs as a lit cigarette. Toner
particles join the cloud of invisible office toxins that
researchers have been identifying in recent years.
The research paints an unsettlingly toxic picture of modern
workplaces: desks laden with more germs than a toilet seat,
office ventilation systems circulating noxious gases, mould
spreading undetected in workplace walls, office chairs and
keyboards warping muscles and bones.
Ms. Hutchinson's biggest problem was the air. Until recently,
people with conditions such as hers were more sensitive to
environmental toxins than any available detection technology.
Now, researchers are using sensors that pick up particulate
smaller than one micron, or about one-50th the diameter of a
human hair.
“We're gaining a new appreciation of this invisible
pollution,” says Karen Bartlett, a professor at the school of
occupational and environmental hygiene of the University of
British Columbia.
The problems don't stop at laser printers.
“We hear a lot of people saying they get headaches when
they're photocopying,” says Frank Haverkate, who runs a
Toronto-based company that tests indoor air quality. “Sure
enough, when someone has a large job going, the [air quality]
sensors go through the roof.”
The particulate floating about offices wouldn't be so bad if
ventilation systems were up to the task of filtering it out.
With up to several hundred grunts' living, breathing and
sweating bodies in a sealed room for eight hours a day, office
workers are almost as dependent on good air circulation as
airline passengers.
Mr. Haverkate once tested an office where workers were
complaining of persistent headaches. He found a cranky old
furnace in the basement and perilously high levels of carbon
monoxide. “I immediately directed everyone to get out of the
building,” says Mr. Haverkate, whose business has taken off
since 2003, when Ottawa passed a bill imposing a legal duty on
company owners to protect workers' safety. “I had a headache for
the rest of the day, and here these workers had been in there
for weeks.”
Somewhat more benign are the germs swarming throughout
workplaces. Keyboards, mouses and phones can be so loaded up
with microbes as to constitute biological weapons. In tests
throughout the Toronto area, Mr. Haverkate has found that most
computer keyboards are more rife with microbial creepy-crawlies
than bathrooms, a finding that props up recent research from the
University of Arizona.
Mr. Haverkate also employs a thermal imaging camera and
yellow Lab named Quincy to sniff out mould-infested walls.
Moulds grow anywhere that moisture builds up, and their health
effects range anywhere from respiratory impairment to organ
damage.
The noxious air doesn't always come from within. Dr. Bartlett
routinely visits workplaces where bad air is being piped in from
outdoors.
Once she tested an office where the air was so redolent of
styrene that workers were falling ill. Trudging outside the
office, she found that the air intake for the entire office
building was situated right next to a fibreglass plant. “They
were having a terrible time there,” Dr. Bartlett says, “but they
never connected the two.”
Work stress and illness
Even if our offices are clear of mould, printer particles and
more biohazards than a medieval infirmary, we can ruin our
bodies by sitting and typing improperly. Desk work flattens out
the lumbar portion of our backs and distends the muscles in the
area of our shoulder blades, giving the seasoned office worker a
distinct pear shape.
And none of that even approaches the minefield of illnesses
linked to work-related stress, which triggers nearly half of all
new depression cases, according to a New Zealand study released
last week.
“Work involves your head more than your muscles these days,”
says Merv Gilbert, a University of British Columbia psychology
professor specializing in occupational health. “It used to be an
injury to your back that was the biggest problem; now it's an
injury to your brain.”
Those psychological wounds can be traced to a variety of
sources, but the most common factors in the workplace, says
Gilbert says, are overworking, underappreciation and bullying.
Some companies in Europe have introduced stress testing for
employees. But in North America, we're still lagging.
“Our health care system is woefully ill-informed about the
workplace,” says Dr. Gilbert, who recently developed a free
online self-help manual for depression in the workplace.
Considering all these office-linked maladies, cubicle
dwellers could be excused for a hint of paranoia. The scare can
go too far, however. “In some cases, these complaints need
addressing, but in many cases, it's just a seasonal flu
spreading through the office,” Dr. Bartlett says. “Hysteria
quite easily takes hold.”
Patrick White